New Rule

Happy Evolute · June 10, 2009, 11:24:03 AM

We have just installed Rule #16.

Please read this, folks.

catwixen · June 10, 2009, 11:54:06 AM

Assyriankey · June 10, 2009, 11:56:44 AM

And our member agreement now says this...

Quote
With this user account you are about to register, you agree to respect the privacy of personal information regarding other members, including emails, email addresses, PMs, real names, addresses, telephone numbers, photographs, employment, medical information and family history. You agree not to reveal any such information, however you came by it.

Breach of any of these terms of use may result in the immediate banning of your account without notice.

Fit2BThaied · June 10, 2009, 11:58:34 AM

Very good.

rickymooston · June 10, 2009, 12:09:47 PM

Sita · June 10, 2009, 12:28:34 PM

Servant of God · June 10, 2009, 12:43:58 PM

Vynn · June 10, 2009, 04:46:40 PM

Good rule. Let's not consider "context" on that one.

leese · June 10, 2009, 05:04:18 PM

Excellent!

cmarie · June 10, 2009, 05:44:30 PM

Good work.

Kerlyssa · June 10, 2009, 11:48:53 PM

Haven't mods used PMs as evidence before in other rule breaks?

Son of Man · June 11, 2009, 01:22:16 AM

Quote from: Kerlyssa on June 10, 2009, 11:48:53 PM

Haven't mods used PMs as evidence before in other rule breaks?

There was not a rule against posting pm's, though it was considered a shltty thing to do. And, if a member is being threatened in pm's, it should be reported.

styleislove · June 11, 2009, 06:03:38 PM

Good rule!

Goobatron · June 11, 2009, 11:37:15 PM

maybe we should keep fly on the forum... He seems to know whats wrong with it, exploits it, then we are encouraged to change or make new rules.

Son of Man · June 12, 2009, 01:02:44 AM

Quote from: Goobatron on June 11, 2009, 11:37:15 PM
maybe we should keep fly on the forum... He seems to know whats wrong with it, exploits it, then we are encouraged to change or make new rules.

That's typically how it works. The rules will work just fine until someone comes along and exploits their weaknesses. Then we tweak the rules and wait for the next person to find more holes. If Fly weren't doing this just to be nasty, we might thank him.

Kerlyssa · June 12, 2009, 02:08:49 AM

It's not like there's ever a shortage of trolls and provocateurs on the internet. Keeping one around specifically to let it troll is giving it a bit too much power, imo.

Change or die.

Goobatron · June 12, 2009, 02:21:47 AM

Quote from: Kerlyssa on June 12, 2009, 02:08:49 AM
It's not like there's ever a shortage of trolls and provocateurs on the internet. Keeping one around specifically to let it troll is giving it a bit too much power, imo.

Change or die.

Sup Hitler.

Kerlyssa · June 12, 2009, 02:23:30 AM

I was actually making a comic book reference, but do go on with your Hitler analogy. I'm curious now.

Goobatron · June 12, 2009, 02:27:07 AM

Well, change or die seems a bit harsh words. How many people here would know it was a comic book reference and not just you saying "Change or die"?

Kerlyssa · June 12, 2009, 02:28:49 AM

How many people would seriously consider that I was telling the mods to go kill fly? Or that fly would die if banned?

One, apparently.

catwixen · June 12, 2009, 02:30:18 AM

It's like saying tits or GTFO....it's not literal.
I agree with Kerl, repeat offenders change or go somewhere else....

rickymooston · June 12, 2009, 02:32:44 AM

Quote from: Kerlyssa on June 12, 2009, 02:08:49 AM
It's not like there's ever a shortage of trolls and provocateurs on the internet. Keeping one around specifically to let it troll is giving it a bit too much power, imo.

Change or die.

Assyriankey · June 12, 2009, 03:02:24 AM

Quote from: Kerlyssa on June 12, 2009, 02:28:49 AM
How many people would seriously consider that I was telling the mods to go kill fly? Or that fly would die if banned?

I use the term 'forum die' to express that concept. Because of Gooba and Trevor...

News:

New Rule