Are you in the IGI Yearbook?
Started by Valyza1, September 24, 2020, 01:09:09 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Valyza1 on September 24, 2020, 03:05:30 PMQuote from: Inertialmass on September 24, 2020, 02:32:30 PMWhich man are all y'all christers gonna burgle?Haha! SteEl
Quote from: Inertialmass on September 24, 2020, 02:32:30 PMWhich man are all y'all christers gonna burgle?
Quote from: Inertialmass on September 24, 2020, 03:44:28 PMAs in, "I'm gonna take the Superman approach to Internet Forum interaction..."
QuoteUse the steel man technique to persuade people who disagree with youTo steel man is to create a version of your opponent's argument that's even stronger than their own.If your visitors have objections, you need to present counter objections. However, it's not enough to present the counter objections straight.The solution comes from two (similar) approaches:Approach 1: Steel manningThe philosopher Daniel Dennett outlines an effective process for arguing with someone who has opposing views:(1) Attempt to re-express the other person's position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that they say, "Thanks, I wish I'd thought of putting it that way."(2) List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).(3) Mention anything you have learned from your target.(4) Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.The first step of Dennett's approach has been called steel manning. It's the opposite of strawmanning, in which you misrepresent the other person's position or argument so you can easily defeat it. In contrast to a strawman, a steel man is an improved form of the other person's views—one that's harder to defeat.Approach 2: Feel–felt–foundDennett's approach overlaps with the "feel–felt–found" technique that is taught in many customer-support call centers:Demonstrate that you understand how the other person feels.Then, describe how you (or someone else) once felt the same as the other person does.Finally, describe how your mind (or someone else's) was changed, and what you instead found to be true.How to apply the above approaches to conversionThe approaches above may sound subtle, but they are powerful.In both of them, you don't just present your counterobjection straight. (You don't just say, "You're wrong. Here's the right answer.")Instead, you first demonstrate that you understand the other person's objection, you demonstrate that it's valid, and then you explain why your counterobjection is a level of thinking deeper, not shallower, than the other person's. (You effectively say, "I understand what you think, and why, but if you think further...") This approach allows the other person to save face and not have to backtrack their thinking (which no one likes to do). At no point are they proven wrong; they just arrive at your verdict through extended thinking.(Note that you'd get nowhere trying to strawman your visitors' views. Your visitors would simply think, "You don't understand me." Straw manning only works by misrepresenting a third party's position. You could, of course, do that with your competitor's arguments. But that's not defensible, and the best persuasion is defensible.)So, if your visitors have objections, don't just contradict them. And certainly don't ignore them. Address the elephant in the room. Explain why their current thinking is valid. Empathize with why they were reasonable in arriving at those conclusions. And then show them the additional thinking that leads from their conclusions to yours.
Quote from: none on October 01, 2020, 12:52:53 AMdumb ass there is a link that is "report to moderator" on each post but you are disabled and can't pay attention... what to do
Quote from: none on October 01, 2020, 01:27:22 AMI am admin
History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of man.--BÖC