Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Anything You Like / Re: WHERES KUSA?
« Last post by Airyaman on Today at 10:23:28 AM »
Damn mods, always going after people who break the rules. How dare they!
2
Religion / Re: In-and-Out --- The Lazy Atheist Strikes Again.
« Last post by composer on Today at 08:44:09 AM »
the “historical Jesus” of Ehrman and New Testament scholars was not born of a virgin, did not say most of the things ascribed to him (at least not all the stuff that is so familiar to Philo, Stoicism, the Essenes or the Pharisees), was not the “Logos/Son of God”, and did not resurrect. (Source: http://www.holyblasphemy.net/bart-ehrman-did-jesus-exist-is-there-evidence-for-a-historical-jesus/christmyththeory)

& I cited authorities supporting me, NOT YOU! confirming that the NT is corrupt!

Don't change the subject, which is the 'historical Jesus',
||think||

The subject is In-and-out etc.

You can't even remember your own Thread subject!  ||yawn||


That is the Jesus of Nazareth, who Professor Ehrman writes about;
The very real Jesus, who we now assume that you 'secretly' believe in ?
||think||

I have always believed along with the Facts that there were likely many called by that name, still are, but the biblical person Ehrman describes and believes in is -  the “historical Jesus” of Ehrman and New Testament scholars was not born of a virgin, did not say most of the things ascribed to him (at least not all the stuff that is so familiar to Philo, Stoicism, the Essenes or the Pharisees), was not the “Logos/Son of God”, and did not resurrect. (Source: http://www.holyblasphemy.net/bart-ehrman-did-jesus-exist-is-there-evidence-for-a-historical-jesus/christmyththeory)


All ye of a hypocrite nature,
||think||

1 John 3:6 confirms your  hypocrisy!

1 John 3:8 confirms your true identity!

Take up your 'free' cross and follow Jesus.
||think||

1 John 3:6 proves you don't & I certainly don't wish to even try to follow this narcissistic mythical as-hole!

I have the Truth, I'll continue to stick with that!  ||wink||  ||grin||

 ||popcorn||
3
Religion / Re: In-and-Out --- The Lazy Atheist Strikes Again.
« Last post by eyeshaveit on Today at 08:31:13 AM »
the “historical Jesus” of Ehrman and New Testament scholars was not born of a virgin, did not say most of the things ascribed to him (at least not all the stuff that is so familiar to Philo, Stoicism, the Essenes or the Pharisees), was not the “Logos/Son of God”, and did not resurrect. (Source: http://www.holyblasphemy.net/bart-ehrman-did-jesus-exist-is-there-evidence-for-a-historical-jesus/christmyththeory)

& I cited authorities supporting me, NOT YOU! confirming that the NT is corrupt!

Don't change the subject, which is the 'historical Jesus',
That is the Jesus of Nazareth, who Professor Ehrman writes about;
The very real Jesus, who we now assume that you 'secretly' believe in ? 

All ye of a hypocrite nature,
Take up your 'free' cross and follow Jesus.
4
Religion / Re: In-and-Out --- The Lazy Atheist Strikes Again.
« Last post by composer on Today at 08:15:21 AM »
How about the forte of "hypocrisy" :
||think||

Your own propaganda exposes you as a hypocrite, i.e. ' claiming to be a genuine believer ', whilst your own Holey book condemns you malignant Sinners as false believers, but the agents of your Devil. (1 John 3:6,8)

bemoaning the lack of suitable evidence for the historical Jesus of Nazareth; all the while citing authorities, who not only believe in a historical Jesus, but even trust in his resurrection, for example Bart D Ehrman, author of The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture ?
||think||

 . . . . the “historical Jesus” of Ehrman and New Testament scholars was not born of a virgin, did not say most of the things ascribed to him (at least not all the stuff that is so familiar to Philo, Stoicism, the Essenes or the Pharisees), was not the “Logos/Son of God”, and did not resurrect. (Source: http://www.holyblasphemy.net/bart-ehrman-did-jesus-exist-is-there-evidence-for-a-historical-jesus/christmyththeory)

& I cited authorities supporting me, NOT YOU! confirming that the NT is corrupt!


Take up your free cross and follow Jesus.
||think||

More Story book none sense, even you don't believe it is truly FREE to believe in this MYTH regardless, but instead belief comes with various forms of intimidation & coercion, e.g. by way of threats! e.g. -

But as for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me.’” (Luke 19:27) English Standard Version/ESV Story book

&

With flaming fire he will mete out11 punishment on those who do not know God12 and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. 1:9 They13 will undergo the penalty of eternal destruction, (2 Thess. 1:8,9) NET Story book

&

Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters. (Luke 11:23) English Standard Version (ESV)

Hence, just like Adolf Hitler, this Story book god also wants to oppress and subjugate every one! (What a magnificent FAILURE it/they are, LOL!)

 ||popcorn||
5
Religion / Re: In-and-Out --- The Lazy Atheist Strikes Again.
« Last post by eyeshaveit on Today at 07:10:50 AM »

 ||think||

Plagiarism is a forte of so called xtianity,  sure!

e.g. - Much of the mythology of Christianity is a rehash of an older and even more transparent fabrication – Judaism.

||popcorn||
'Take up your free cross and follow Jesus' (plagiarized from the Holy Bible - Matthew 16:24).
||think||

So I foretold accurately, that plagiarism is indeed the forte of those claiming to be a xtian, and the forte of those exposed as jebus' frauds, but agents of their Devil. (1 John 3:6 & 8)

According to your own Holey bible, you eyes & Co. qualify in all those shameful respects!

 ||popcorn||

How about the forte of "hypocrisy" : bemoaning the lack of suitable evidence for the historical Jesus of Nazareth; all the while citing authorities, who not only believe in a historical Jesus, but even trust in his resurrection, for example Bart D Ehrman, author of The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture ?

Ehrman:
Ehrman's recent book on the subject is entitled "The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture". Its title speaks for itself.

What about such rampant hypocrisy, or do you think religious studies are like a Chinese Restaurant menu : take one from Column A (atheist) and one from Column B (believer) ?

Take up your free cross and follow Jesus.
6
Religion / Re: In-and-Out --- The Lazy Atheist Strikes Again.
« Last post by composer on Today at 06:42:41 AM »

 ||think||

Plagiarism is a forte of so called xtianity,  sure!

e.g. - Much of the mythology of Christianity is a rehash of an older and even more transparent fabrication – Judaism.

||popcorn||
'Take up your free cross and follow Jesus' (plagiarized from the Holy Bible - Matthew 16:24).
||think||

So I foretold accurately, that plagiarism is indeed the forte of those claiming to be a xtian, and the forte of those exposed as jebus' frauds, but agents of their Devil. (1 John 3:6 & 8)

According to your own Holey bible, you eyes & Co. qualify in all those shameful respects!

 ||popcorn||
7
Anything You Like / Re: WHERES KUSA?
« Last post by Steveox on Today at 06:21:42 AM »
He replied to me in PM. He blames Mooby why he left. Mooby put him on moderation he got tired of his B.S and he left. Ever wondering why im not hanging around here as much? Its because of the Mods.
8
Non-Theism / Re: The Autonomous Self - Humanist Wisdom :
« Last post by eyeshaveit on Today at 05:44:25 AM »
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it?” - Douglas Adams - The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
9
Religion / Re: Christian Life - Pop Exam - Essay Questions.
« Last post by eyeshaveit on Today at 05:40:13 AM »
Explain 'the philosophy of pragmatism' ?
10
Religion / Re: Christian Doctrine - Pop Quiz.
« Last post by eyeshaveit on Today at 05:36:12 AM »
What is the 'Just War Threory' ?

Spoiler


"Just war theory (jus bellum iustum) is a doctrine, also referred to as a tradition, of military ethics studied by theologians, ethicists, policy makers, and military leaders. The purpose of the doctrine is to ensure war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just." - Wikipedia.

"First, just war must be waged by a properly instituted authority such as the state. (Proper Authority is first: represents the common good: which is peace for the sake of man's true end—God.)

"Second, war must occur for a good and just purpose rather than for self-gain (for example, "in the nation's interest" is not just) or as an exercise of power (just cause: for the sake of restoring some good that has been denied. i.e. lost territory, lost goods, punishment for an evil perpetrated by a government, army, or even the civilian populace).

"Third, peace must be a central motive even in the midst of violence. (right intention: an authority must fight for the just reasons it has expressly claimed for declaring war in the first place. Soldiers must also fight for this intention). - Thomas Aquinas - Wikipedia.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10