No objection to natural selection being anything more than the gradual development of traits within the limits of sexual reproduction, but the word "evolution" is a bomb, evoking far more than that.
i gave you an example of evolution in an asexual organism, eyes. let's not forget that.
but you seem to have difficulties with the word "evolution."
what exactly is the problem?
Your asexual organism example OK,
But "evolution" has more than one meaning,
Such as one Google example: "the forms of written languages undergo constant evolution".
But my acquaintances do not refer to developing hybrid African violets or the selective breeding of border collies as evolution ?
So that's a squint at you using the word "evolution" as a foundation of brown snake-like clouds, on which to build an impenetrable castle ?