Is God Imaginary?
September 04, 2010, 03:30:41 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: IGI has a Facebook group!
 
   Home   Help Arcade Search RULES Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: What defines "evil"?  (Read 357 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Airyaman
Who is honestly a
Valued Member

Karma: +768/-88
Offline Offline
Posts: 5,505



WWW Ignore
« on: October 27, 2008, 08:10:36 PM »

How do we know when a thought, word, or action is "evil"?
Logged

The goal should never be to convince others that one's own experience is universal, rather to accept the experience that one has and to grow from it.-- The Shaman Atheist
Happy Evolute
Forum Bulldog
Valued Member

Karma: +1186/-130
Offline Offline
Posts: 8,087


The Heavens declare the absence of the Lord.

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2008, 08:21:36 PM »

When it fails to consider the other person as a person.
Logged

An axiom is a proposition that defeats its opponents by the fact that they have to accept it and use it in the process of any attempt to deny it. - Ayn Rand
Fit2BThaied
Valued Member

Karma: +625/-52
Offline Offline
Posts: 3,423



Ignore
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2008, 08:24:02 PM »

Answering this question posed by the OP elsewhere, "So why do so many Christians fail to follow Torah Law? Please don't give me the "new covenant" answer. Same god, never changes. Jesus, same yesterday, today, and forever.  That is why I ask the question "How do you know what qualifies as 'godly'?" The bible leaves many things out IMHO. What about smoking marijuana in places of the world where it is legal? What about going 120 MPH on the Autobahn..."

Sorry, but there is a new covenant, precisely because the permanently divine and immutable Jesus decided to change the rules, without changing Himself.  The fact that the essence of the Godhead is immutable is the very thing that gives it the power to change the rules.  But thaks for asking. cheesy
Logged

I am often wrong, but not always.
jill
Valued Member

Karma: +662/-48
Offline Offline
Posts: 3,489



Ignore
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2008, 08:48:42 PM »

It's not "What" defines evil but "who".

Evil is in the eye of the beholder....be it an individual or a community. 
Logged

KEEPIN' IT REAL

"It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going."- Stephen Hawking
QuestionMark
Rebmem Deulav
Valued Member

Karma: +998/-544
Offline Offline
Posts: 9,666


Are you innocent?

WWW Ignore
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2008, 09:05:32 PM »

You asked why Christians fail to observe the Torah Law. The same reason David failed to observe the Torah Law when he ate the bread of presence, and all the High priests when they worked on the Sabbath. Because it's not the human interpretation of the letter of the law that is important, it's the spiritual law. Are we doing what the will of God is? That is the question.

In reality, when you face judgment, there is no lawyering. You can't pull technicalities. It's all about intent. The Torah showed this, but not clearly. As time went by God clarified the law, and manifested it in increasing power.
Logged

Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? - Romans 2:4
Airyaman
Who is honestly a
Valued Member

Karma: +768/-88
Offline Offline
Posts: 5,505



WWW Ignore
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2008, 11:12:25 PM »

If it feels right, do it? How is this any different than any human approaches life?  beer chug
Logged

The goal should never be to convince others that one's own experience is universal, rather to accept the experience that one has and to grow from it.-- The Shaman Atheist
catwixen
Still the most drunken
Valued Member

Karma: +1360/-53
Offline Offline
Posts: 8,499



Ignore
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2008, 11:16:15 PM »

Evil is a word with religious connotations. Evil does not exist in the real world. Evil was used as a description for an opposition to Godly actions....
I never use it to describe what people do. People are bad or good. They destroy or create. Even a serial killer or pedophile I would not call evil because it denotes some supernatural interference, which I do not believe.
Logged

JesusHChrist:
I pray to the FSM your wine/food pairings are audacious and salutory. Ramen.
IrishMauddib
Valued Member

Karma: +183/-22
Offline Offline
Posts: 550



Ignore
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2008, 06:09:32 AM »

Airyaman,

This is a good AND a bad question. It is good because it is interesting and can spark a long discussion. It is bad because it is a little too general. You would need to specify if you are talking in religion, in day to day life, in morality itself…. I could go on for hours.

The problem being of course that a general question gets a general answer and then people go on for hours comparing exceptions.

Since no one here has bothered to provide any evidence for a god or a supreme moral law giver then Jill here has given the best answer so far.

We decide together as a species what is moral. No other moral law giver has been shown to exist except us. We come up with the concepts of morals, what is moral and what is not.

“Evil” therefore is just what is contrary to the socially decided moral norm.

However as I said the question is too general. This is retrospective “evil” labelled after a moral norm is established. During the establishment of the moral norm “evil” would refer to those actions or outcomes we wish to avoid while creating the moral norm.

So clearly, as good a question as it is, you really need to clarify exactly what it is you are asking.
Logged
Airyaman
Who is honestly a
Valued Member

Karma: +768/-88
Offline Offline
Posts: 5,505



WWW Ignore
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2008, 08:50:28 PM »

Airyaman,

This is a good AND a bad question. It is good because it is interesting and can spark a long discussion. It is bad because it is a little too general. You would need to specify if you are talking in religion, in day to day life, in morality itself…. I could go on for hours.

It was a spin-off of another thread. I'm trying to do my part in not derailing threads with other topics.

Since the title of this site is "Is God Imaginary" I would suppose the religious approach would be the predominant one.
Logged

The goal should never be to convince others that one's own experience is universal, rather to accept the experience that one has and to grow from it.-- The Shaman Atheist
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!